While being an effective management tool, ERP software have seen a plethora of unsuccessful implementation stories. Why so?
An ERP sales cycle takes 6-12 months before a client makes a decision on an ERP vendor. During this phase, client evaluates a handful of ERP Vendors with each vendor giving his best shot ( presentation, promises, videos, and demos) to win the account. The one who meets the expectations of the client in terms of features, functionality, costs, brand value, and ease of implementation often bags the account. It is during this period that the client’s expectations about his role and efforts required in the ERP implementation process are set – thanks to a bunch of desperate salesmen trying to sell at any cost.
Often ERP vendors (fiercely competing to bag the account) convince prospects that their ERP Software implementation is painless or their ERP is a ‘buy and use’ type, or meets most of the prospect’s requirements and requires minimum efforts from the client during implementation. With these over-enthusiastic sales and marketing pitches prospects often make an assumption that “ERP is totally a vendor baby” ; and thereafter buying an ERP software client is not ready to put in the hard efforts required to make any ERP implementation a success.
The catch-22 situation – of convincing a prospect that ERP is beneficial for his business but needs significant effort from both sides and also selling it successfully – can be resolved by an effective yet ethical sales approach where the focus is on understanding the business needs and educating the prospect on all aspects of buying an ERP software.
The success of any ERP (for both vendor and client) lies in its successful implementation merely because only after that the benefits/profits can be realized. Here are some insights for an effective sales approach that is beneficial for successful selling as well as effective ERP implementation thereafter:
The first interaction with the prospect should hinge on finding why he want to implement ERP software, and what problems of his business does he wishes to resolve through the ERP software. It should also help the vendors to understand his mindset. What does a prospect expect from the ERP software, apart from resolving his key pain points? What does he expect in terms of final outcome of the ERP, having heard so many stories about costs, deliveries and end results and finding a top selling erp software is also a tough job.
One needs to make a presentation with the issues that confront the prospect mapped into the presentation. This means some work, some addition and modification of the generic ERP software presentation of the vendor.
IT industry is famous for hype creation and throwing up new buzzwords every now and then. Concepts are tossed around as actual solutions. This creates confusion in the mind of the prospect. The challenge is to bring the prospect out of these confusions without making him feel ignorant about reality.
One needs to separate myth vs. reality with all due respect to prospect. The myth about the end result, the myth about ERP software implementation being a short-term affair, a click-on/click-off affair, or a panacea for all ills. One must explain that ERP implementation is a partnership and not a responsibility of the vendor alone where the customer can sit back till he/she is handed over the keys to the new structure! Most of the ERP software implementations fail due to this misconception.
New technologies offer so many varied options that they look very attractive to the user and he/she gets blown away. But, vendors may not explain that many of these would require vendor support at a cost. These are shown as off-the-shelf facilities that require no user skill, which is far from truth. There are options that mean nothing in actual usage, or such that their setup would make software usage very complex. Especially in new-user organizations, software has to be simple and easy to use.
New technologies also allow very good cosmetics onto the ERP software. A new vendor may be good on such a cosmetic show but low on depth of ERP understanding. Thus, user may end up buying a flashy car with a defective engine.
Here again, there is a challenge for the vendor to bring the prospect to a trade-off between the brand (meaning paying high premium for the name, paying for functionalities that the organization does not require) and the cost. A prospect may say, there is no budget constraint for buying ERP software, but in reality, there is always a trade-off between budgets and value of the software in terms of actual delivery of requirements.
There is a gap between the expectations of line-users, middle-tier user, and top management. Ultimately, ERP is the tool for management and not the line user. Line user has to make vouchers – on what media is immaterial. Based on where and how the entry is made, the top management will get results out of the ERP software. ERP is a tool more for the management than for the line user. Thus, the presentation of the ERP software varies hugely depending on who is looking at it. Thus, vendor representatives must take care that he/she reaches the real decision maker of the organization to understand his/her requirements and build an equation with this person, else one may end up working on people who have no relevance in final decision-making or making a presentation about how to use the ERP while the decision maker may be more concerned about the final outcome and reliability of the ERP vendor.
Every organization has a culture and working idiom. The vendor representative needs to absorb this and make a presentation that gels with their culture and working style. Only then can he create a positive impression that may lead him/her to the final closure.
If the buying / selling of an ERP software follows an honest and ethical effort by both ERP vendor as well as prospects, the implementation will be successful and deal will offer returns to both.